( 1 ) LEARNED Advocate Ms. Sejal K. Mandavia appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Learned Advocate Mr. D. M. Thakker appearing on behalf of the respondent. Rule, Mr. D. M. Thakker Learned Advocate on behalf of respondent waives the service of rule. With the consent of both the Learned Advocates, the matter has been taken up for final hearing today. In the present petition, the award passed by the Labour Court, Surat in Reference No. 183 of 1986 dated 8. 10. 1998 has been challenged wherein, the Labour Court, Surat has granted reinstatement with continuity of service with full back wages of interim period with all consequential benefits. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present petition are that the respondent was appointed as a Clerk on 7th September, 1982 and his service was terminated on 16th April, 1986. At the time of termination Section 25-F has not been followed by the petitioner. Though the case of petitioner that at the time of termination the notice was given and Rs. 372/which was sent to the respondent but same was not accepted by the respondent. The amount of Rs. 372. 00 was not the complete retrenchment compensation because, in all four year