SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 570

D.M.DHARMADHIKARI, J.M.PANCHAL
ABAD DAIRY – Appellant
Versus
MANJIBHAI DHANJIBHAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.V.PATEL, K.M.PATEL, K.R.KOSHTI, M.B.GOHIL, MUKUL SINHA

D. M. DHARMADHIKARI, J.

( 1 ) THESE Letters Patent Appeals have been preferred by Abad Dairy which is a unit of Gujarat Dairy Development corporation Limited, and is an employer within the meaning of the Industrial disputes Act, 1947. The employer feels aggrieved by a common oral judgment pronounced on 23-4-1996, 1-5-1996, 21-6-1996, 3-8-1996 and 5-8-1996 by learned single Judge (M. R. Calla, J.) (reported in 7997 (2) GLR 1204 ). The employer also feels aggrieved by the judgment dated 22-1-1998 passed by the learned single Judge (Rajesh Balia, J.) in some of the cognate matters, which are being decided by this common judgment.

( 2 ) THE common question involved in all these appeals is whether the Badli workmen employed in Abad Dairy, after it was taken over from the Ahmedabad municipal Corporation by the present employer i. e. Gujarat Dairy Development corporation, are entitled to the relief of regularisation of their service and payment of consequential monetary benefits on their completion of 900 days of work in last period of 5 years in terms of tripartite settlement dated 11-5-1981 and circulars dated 29-12-1978, 2-6-1983 and 16-8-1984 alleged to have been issued thereunder. Lea




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top