SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 664

J.N.BHATT, K.M.MEHTA
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
GEMINI INDUSTRIES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: PRANAV G.DESAI, S.R.SHAH

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) ). BY this appeal under Sec. 96 of the Code of Civil procedure, the appellant-original plaintiff. State Bank of India, has questioned the absolving of respondent Nos. 6 and 7 guarantors of cash credit transaction between the appellant and respondent Nos. 1 to 5 from payment of decreetal dues holding that there was no continuing guarantee. The parties are hereinafter referred to, as arrayed in the suit for the sake of convenience and brevity.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff had to initiate a legal battle by filing Special Civil Suit no. 35 of 1983 in the Court of Civil Judge (S. D.) Kachchh, at Bhuj, against respondent Nos. 1 to 7 who are original defendants Nos. 1 to 7 in the suit for the recovery of the bank dues of Rs. 8, 82, 093. 47 ps. together with interest at the rate of 15% per annum with effect from 1-4-1983 till date of payment from all the defendants jointly and severally pursuant to a cash credit loan transaction entered into on 19-10-1978 between the plaintiff bank and the original defendant Nos. 1 to 5. Original defendant No. 1 is partnership firm, whereas, original defendant Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 are partners of original defendant No. 1. Original defendant Nos.


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top