SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 633

H.K.RATHOD
I. H. MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.B.Parikh, R.V.DESAI

H. K. RATHOD, J.

( 1 ) ). LEARNED Advocate Mr. Parikh is appearing for the petitioner. Learned A. G. P. Mr. R. V. Desai is appearing for the respondents. In this petition, rule was issued by this Court on 17-7-1987 and the matter was ordered to be heard expeditiously. Respondents have not filed any reply to the present petition.

( 2 ) ). The facts of the present petition, in brief, are that the petitioner was appointed as a clerk on 16-1-1951 in the Revenue Department in the Amreli district. On 15-8-1960, he was promoted as a senior clerk (now deputy mamlatdar) and on 1-6-1980, he was promoted as a mamlatdar and was posted as rojgar project officer at Dhrol, and thereafter as R. R. T. , Jamnagar. He served upto 5-10-1981. From 6-10-1981 to 21-7-1986, he worked as Mamlatdar at ranavav, Junagadh District and in July, again, he was posted as R. R. T. , Collector office, Amreli. According to the petitioner, next promotion is to the post of deputy collector and he was eligible and was entitled to be promoted to the post of deputy collector in October, 1986. However, he was not promoted to the said post and other persons junior to him were promoted to the said post. The petitioner was req










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top