SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 673

R.M.DOSHIT
GIRDHAR C. KORU – Appellant
Versus
MANAGING DIRECTOR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.R.GUPTA, P.K.PANCHOLI, PREMAL R.JOSHI, R.J.OZA

R. M. DOSHIT, J.

( 1 ) LEARNED advocates Mr. Pancholi appearing for the petitioner and Mr. B. R Gupta appearing for the respondent no. 1 are not present on call. Heard learned AGP Mr. Premal Joshi for the respondents no. 2 and 3.

( 2 ) THE Gujarat State Handloom Development Corporation Limited, the respondent no. 1 herein [hereinafter referred to as, `the Corporation] had on 13th July, 1989 published an advertisement inviting the applications from eligible candidates belonging to Scheduled Tribes for the post of Deputy Manager [purchase and Processing]. Pursuant to the said advertisement, the petitioner made an application. By communication dated 15th September, 1989, the petitioner was called to remain present for interview on 19th September, 1989. Though the petitioner was the only applicant present for interview and though he was eligible, he was not selected, instead a fresh advertisement was published on 25th September, 1989. Upon inquiry, the petitioner learnt that the petitioner was not considered to be a Scheduled Tribe candidate. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner has preferred the present petition.

( 3 ) IT is contended that the petitioner belongs to Halba community which i





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top