SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 699

D.C.SRIVASTAVA
TAHERALI KADIBHAI – Appellant
Versus
SAFDARHUSAIN ABDULRAHIM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: SURESH M.SHAH, YOGESH S.LAKHANI

D. C. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is tenants revision under Section 29 (2) of the Bombay Rent Act against concurrent judgment and decrees of the trial Court and the lower Appellate Court.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts are that the revisionist, who was admittedly tenant of the respondent in the disputed premises, filed Suit for declaration and permanent injunction that the landlord - respondent had no right to raise construction in a portion of the tenanted accommodation known as "deli". The deli is nothing but open land enclosed by boundry wall or some other temporary structure. The landlord purchased the said premises from the previous owner. The landlord intended to raise construction over the deli portion. The tenant revisionist apprehended that the landlord will encroach upon his tenancy right hence he filed Suit for declaration that it be declared that the deli portion is in his tenancy and further sought injunction that the landlord be restrained from raising construction over Deli portion.

( 3 ) THE landlord respondent contested the Suit on the ground that all the allegations made by the tenant revisionist were incorrect and false and that the deli portion was not in the tenancy of the ten


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top