( 1 ) THE petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present petition against the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation and two others for various reliefs. From the contents of the petition, it appears that his grievance was that he was a tenant of a cabin. For the purpose of widening the road, the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation was likely to take action for removal of the Pan Shop, i. e. cabin. Learned Single Judge admitted the petition and granted ex-parte interim relief by which the respondents were restrained from evicting and dispossessing the petitioner from the suit premises in any manner whatsoever.

( 2 ) WHEN the matter was called out yesterday, learned advocate for the petitioner did not remain present and the matter was adjourned to today. Today when the matter was called out in the first session, learned advocate for the petitioner did not remain present. Even in the second session, he has not chosen to remain present and therefore, we have heard the learned counsel for the Municipal Corporation, appearing in the matter.

( 3 ) IN the petition, the petitioner has averred that on 1. 1. 1977 he was granted lease of the suit premises (cabin) at a monthly r