M.S.SHAH
ICICI LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) ). IN this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, three public Financial Institutions, viz. ICICI Ltd. , Industrial Development Bank of India and IFCI Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ICICI, IDBI and IFCI respectively or as "public financial institutions") have challenged the notification dated 22. 10. 1999 (annexure "c") issued by the State of Gujarat under the provisions of Bombay Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as "bru Act") in favour of respondent No. 2-Gujarat Telephone Cables Ltd, a public limited company. The petitioners have also prayed for a writ to restrain the State Government from issuing any fresh notification in favour of respondent No. 2-Company or renewing the notification issued under BRU Act in favour of respondent No. 2.
( 2 ) THE petitioners are public financial institutions which had advanced loans to respondent No. 2-Gujarat Telephone Cables Ltd (hereinafter referred to as "the respondent Company" or "the Company" ). The petitioners had advanced loans in various categories to the respondent Company as per the statements at Annexures A and B respectively. The particulars of advances, outst
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.