SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 30

D.M.DHARMADHIKARI, M.S.SHAH
ABDULSATTAR YUSUFBHAI QURESHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ARUN D.OZA, ARUN H.MEHTA

D. M. DHARMADHIKARI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners are engaged in the business of slaughter and selling of meat of bulls, bullocks and other animals. By this petition, they question the constitutional validity of the Notification dated 11-12-1989 published in Government Gazette dated 13-12-1989 by the State of Gujarat, which is purported to have been issued by it in exercise of its powers conferred under clause (b) of subsection (1) and clause (g) of subsection (2) of Section 4 and clause (a) of subsection (1) of Section 5 of the Gujarat Essential Commodities and Cattle (Control) Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act of 1958) as applicable to the State of Gujarat. By the impugned Notification, the earlier Notification issued on the same subject and under the same provisions of law dated 15-10-1976 has been modified, in so far as the imposition of ceiling of maximum number of bulls and bullocks that may be slaughtered in the City of Ahmedabad. Prior to the impugned Notification, the existing Notification dated 15-10-1976 published in Government Gazette dated 15-11-1976 issued under the provisions of Section 4 and 5 of the Act prescribed maximum limits for slaughter of bulls and b
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top