SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 10

J.N.BHATT, Y.B.BHATT
CHAMPAKBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: SURESH M.SHAH

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) ). BY this petition under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, challenge, at the instance of the appellant-original petitioner, is against the order passed in Tax Appeal No. 17 of 1998 by the Director of Transport, Gujarat state which came to be confirmed in. Special Civil Application No. 9282 of 1998, by the Learned single Judge on 31-8-2000, on the main premise that, the appellant cannot be fastened with liability for payment of arrears of Motor vehicles Tax as he had sold the vehicle.

( 2 ) IN order to appreciate the merits of this appeal and challenge against it, a few relevant material facts may be highlighted, here as under :- 1. The appellant-original petitioner is doing a business of Travel Agent, at anand. The petitioner is the owner of some luxury buses. 2. Out of them, one luxury bus bearing No. GTG-4444 had already been sold to the respondent No. 3, one Mr. D. N. Patel, as per the case of the original petitioner, and therefore, the petitioner is not liable for the payment of arrears of tax in respect of the said vehicle. 3. The said vehicle was also transferred by the respondent No. 3 Mr. D. N. Patel to respondent No. 4 one Mr. R. N. Patel. 4. The respo




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top