SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 8

D.C.SRIVASTAVA
KANUBEN DAUGHTER OF JAYSINH KHUSHALSINH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.H.BAGCHI, SURESH M.SHAH, Y.F.MEHTA

D. C. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THE prayer of the petitioners in this petition is for quashing the order of the Deputy Collector dated 5-5-1992 (Annexure-a), order dated 17-9-1992 of the Collector, Bharuch (Annexure-b) and order dated 28-12-1995 of the Deputy Secretary (Appeals), Revenue Department, Government of Gujarat (Annexure-c ).

( 2 ) THE brief facts giving rise to this petition are as under:- on 4-8-1990, the petitioners purchased agricultural land of Survey No. 160/1 of Jadeshwar from one Bhailal Patel for a sum of Rs. 61,000=00. The purchase was reported to the revenue authorities whereupon, Mutation Entry No. 4617 was made in the name of the petitioners on 5-8-1990 in Form No. 6 in the revenue records. This entry was certified on 29-12-1990 after necessary verification. On 22-8-1991, the Chief Secretary (Appeals), Revenue Department, Ahmedabad instructed the Deputy Collector, Bharuch for initiating proceedings for review of the mutation entry. On 5-5-1992, the Deputy Collector, Bharuch registered a Revision Case No. 15/1992 against the petitioners and the vendor and ultimately cancelled the mutation entry on 5-5-1992. This action seems to have been taken on the application dat

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top