S.K.KESHOTE
HIMANSHU S. MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.
( 2 ) THE petitioner, an employee of Gujarat Dairy Development Corporation, Gandhinagar through this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a declaration that the action of the respondent-Corporation in not granting him scale of Rs. 1400-2600 and decided to redesignating the post of Draughtsman to Tracer as arbitrary, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and illegal null and void. The petitioner has come up with the case that he possessing the certificate course in Draughtsman (Civil) from ITI, he joined the Corporation services as Draftsman (Civil) in the pay scale of Rs. 350-560 on 15. 2. 1984. It is averred that the petitioner when he joined services as Draughtsman (Civil)) did not know the prevailing scale of pay of the Draughtsman (Civil) in the Government Services which at the relevant time was of Rs. 425-800. This pay scales were revised from time to time and the petitioner is claiming parity in the pay scale on the ground of equal pay for equal work. It is not in dispute that in the Government of Gujarat and more particularly, in the Civil Engineering Department thereo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.