SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 79

K.M.MEHTA
RAJESHBHAI CHANDUBHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.DESAI, VINOD H.THAKORE

K. M. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) RAJESHBHAI Chandubhai and others, applicants-original accused have filed this Criminal Revision Application under Sec. 397 read with sec. 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as code) challenging the order dated 19th December, 2000, passed by learned sessions Judge, Bharuch in Sessions Case No. 130 of 1999. The petitioners have also challenged the order of learned Sessions Judge dated 19th October, 2000, passed below Exh. 37 deposition of Maheshbhai Natvarbhai, order dated 9th november, 2000, passed below Exh. 38 - deposition of Gautam Shanabhai Vasai and order dated 9th November, 2000, passed below Exh. 39 - deposition of manojbhai Ravjibhai Patel also. So in all, the petitioners have challenged the aforesaid four orders of the learned Sessions Judge, Bharuch. The learned Judge by the said orders was pleased to reject the application filed by the accused at Exh. 55 filed under Sec. 311 of the Cr. P. C. for recalling the three prosecution witnesses for contradicting them with their respective police statements and prove the same and to grant permission for cross-examination in connection with those and other related facts.

( 2 )














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top