SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 118

S.K.KESHOTE
RATANLAL GULABCHAND GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
SAHARA SEV GRUH UDYOG BHANDAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ASHOK PANDEY, IQBAL M.MALIK, Samir Dave

S. K. KESHOTE, J.

( 1 ) ). The challenge has been made by the petitioner original complainant in the Criminal Case No. 277/95 under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, to the orders passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 10, Ahmedabad and of the learned Additional City Sessions Judge, Court No. 19, Ahmedabad in the matter of restoration of the case aforestated dismissed for non-prosecution. This criminal case was registered on the private complaint filed by the petitioner.

( 2 ) ). The facts of the case are that the respondents Nos. 1 and 2 used to purchase "mendo" from the petitioner. The last purchase of Mendo on credit worth Rs. 1,21,687. 00 was made by the respondents Nos. 1 and 2 against bills of various dates. Towards the payment of the amount aforesaid, the respondent No. 2 issued cheques, the details of which are given in paragraph No. 3 of this Special Criminal Application. On presentation of these cheques by the petitioner with his bankers - The Kalupur Commercial Co-operative Bank, Chowka Bazaar, Ahmedabad for encashment thereof, the same were return by his bankers with endorsement "insufficient balance" and "exceeds arrangement". On 29th Dece











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top