SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 143

KUNDAN SINGH
VINAYAKRAO S. DESAI – Appellant
Versus
INTERLINK PETROLEUM LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: Paresh Upadhyay, V.S.DESAI

KUNDAN SINGH, J.

( 1 ) ). THIS is an application tiled under Art. 226 (3) of the Constitution of India, by the applicant-original respondent No. 1 for vacating the ex parte ad-interim order dated 16-12-1999 granted in the petition.

( 2 ) IT is stated that the above Special Civil Application was filed in this court and this Court passed the following order :"rule. Notice as to interim relief returnable on 18-1-2000. Ad-interim relief in terms of Para 8 (C) till then. Sd/- date : 16-12-1999 A. M. Kapadia, Judge. "this application has been moved on the following main amongst other grounds as mentioned in Para-2 of the application. (1) There is no pleading, documentary evidence and affidavit-in-support of an urgency at all for an ad-interim relief in the petition. (2) A claim to an ad-interim relief in Para 8 (C) of the petition is without a cause of action alleged, evidence and duly proved especially therefor on the face of the petition anywhere. (3) An otherwise please "as the matter is urgent one" alleged of and addressed to the learned Registrar of this Honble Court in the "urgent note" dated apparently nil by the learned two Advocates for the opponent Nos. 1 and 2 is opposed to, ou
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top