D. C. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) LIST has been revised twice, none appeared for the respondents. As such, Shri BJ Shelat, learned counsel for the revisionist has been heard and the judgments of the courts below have been examined.

( 2 ) THE revisionist, landlord filed a suit for eviction of the tenant-in-chief, respondent no. 1 and also the sub-tenants, respondent nos. 2 and 3 on various grounds. The first ground was that, the tenant was in arrears of rent exceeding six months. The second ground was that, the respondent no. 1, tenant had illegally sub-let the suit land to the respondent nos. 2 and 3 without his consent in writing. The third ground was that, the land in suit was reasonably and bonafidely required by the landlord, revisionist for his personal use. The next ground was that, the sub-tenants, respondent nos. 2 and 3 were creating nuisance on the suit land. Another ground was that, the tenant-in-chief, as well as, the sub-tenants are using the suit land for purpose which is contrary to the terms of contract between the tenant and the landlord contained in the rent note and there has been change of u/ser of the suit land.

( 3 ) THE suit was resisted by the tenant-in-chief, respo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document