SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 215

ANIL R.DAVE, J.R.VORA
BIMALSINGH DUGGAL – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: H.N.Brahmbhatt, R.K.MISHRA

A. R. DAVE, J.

( 1 ) BEING aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge (S. D.), Gandhidham, in Special Civil Suit No. 341 of 1995 dated 29-10-1996, this first appeal has been filed by original defendant no. 2.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to the present appeal, in a nutshell, are as under :

( 3 ) RESPONDENT No. 1 is Central Bank of India. It had lent a sum of Rs. 1,52,000. 00 to respondent No. 2 for the purpose of purchase of a truck. The present appellant was a surety and had executed a deed of guarantee. As respondent no. 2 did not make payment of the amount due and payable by him to respondent no. 1 Bank, respondent No. 1 Bank filed Special Civil Suit No. 341 of 1995 decree passed by the Civil Judge (S. D.), Gandhidham in Special Civil Suit No. 341 of 1995 dated 29-10-1996. for the purpose of recovery of the amount, which was due and payable by the principal debtor, namely, Babulal M. Mehta, who is respondent No. 2 herein. The present appellant was a surety, and therefore, he was joined in the said suit as defendant No. 2. The said suit was decreed and being aggrieved by the judgment and decree, the surety, that is, original defendant No. 2, has approached this C

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top