SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 212

H.H.MEHTA
OIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSION – Appellant
Versus
BALARAM CEMENTS LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: G.T.DAYANI, KALPANABEN BRAHMBHATT

H. H. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) AT the request of learned advocates for both the parties, these two appeals from orders are disposed by this common judgment, as in both these appeals, a common order dated 19th September, 1992 passed below application Ex. 5 and Ex. 18 in Special Civil Suit No. 2 of 1991 which is still pending on the file of learned III Joint Civil Judge (Senior Division), Palanpur (who will be referred o hereinafter as the learned Judge of the trial Court for the sake of convenience), has been challenged on the ground that said common order by which two applications Exs. 5 and 18 have been disposed of, is not legal and valid and the same is not according to law.

( 2 ) IN Appeal From Order No. 546 of 1992, appellant is the defendant no. 1, while respondent nos. 1 and 2 are original plaintiff and defendant no. 2 respectively in Special Civil Suit No. 2 of 1991. 2. 1 in Appeal From Order No. 566 of 1992, appellant is original plaintiff, while respondents are defendant nos. 1 and 2 respectively in aforesaid suit. For the sake of convenience, parties will be referred to hereinafter as the plaintiff and respective defendants at appropriate places.

( 3 ) IN Appeal From Order No. 546































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top