( 1 ) THE order dated 2-3-2001 of Additional Sessions Judge, Vadodara passed in Criminal Revision Application No. 19/2001 is under challenge in this revision.

( 2 ) THE instant revision has been filed under the following circumstances : a complaint was filed against 18 persons named as accused. Surajben was the complainant. On this complaint, an order was passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vadodara on 14-11-2000 under sec. 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, directing investigation to be made on the complaint by Gorva Police Station. On plain reading of the complaint, the Chief Judicial Magistrate found that, it appeared that mischief has been played with the documentary evidence, and if, police investigation is carried out for the same, necessary documents are required to be seized and thorough investigation is necessary. The complaint was under sections-420, 465, 466, 446, 468, 471, 506 (2), 120 (B) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears from the record that one of the accused Chandrakant Keshavlal Shah, on receipt of information from the police station, moved an application before the Chief Judicial Magistrate annexing necessary documents a