SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 595

K.R.VYAS, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
PRAVINKUMAR CHANDRAKANT VYAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.H.DESAI, MANISHA LAV KUMAR SHAH, Y.S.LAKHANI

D. M. DHARMADHIKARI, J.

( 1 ) ). IN the S. C. A. and L. P. A. , common question of general importance raised by the petitioners is on the constitutional and legal validity of the circulars No. RB/618/476/1999 styled as Standing Order no. 28 dated 20-2-1999 and No. RB/618/1433/2001, dated 25-5-2001 of the police Commissioner, Rajkot city to all his subordinate police officers.

( 2 ) WE shall deal with and reproduce the contents of the two impugned circulars hereinafter. The two circulars in substance direct the subordinate police officers to make necessary investigation of the case of arrestees in any bailable offence and for that purpose interrogate them, take their finger prints, identification marks and photographs. He has advised the police officers not to forthwith release the accused on bail in bailable offences without making necessary preliminary investigation and for that purpose, if necessary, they may obtain remand from the Magistrate. One of the circulars also directs that if in a case of bailable offence, the arrestee is released within 16 hours, the concerned police officer shall submit a report with his cogent reasons to the Assistant Police commissioner with a copy th

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top