SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 587

D.A.MEHTA, ANIL R.DAVE
COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX – Appellant
Versus
RAMLUBHAIYA R. MALHOTRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: AKIL KURESHI, MANISH R.BHATT, R.K.PATEL

D. A. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) THE Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench c, has referred the following question for the opinion of this Court :"whether the Tribunal was right in law and on facts in upholding the claim of the assessee for depreciation u/s 34 (2) (ii) specially when the proprietary business was converted into a partnership firm during the relevant accounting period?"

( 2 ) THE Assessment Year is 1977-78 and the accounting period is Financial Year 1976-77. The assessee was running a proprietary business in the name of Standard Rolling Mills and the said business was conducted for the period 1. 4. 1976 to 30. 6. 1976 during the financial year. With effect from 1. 7. 1976 the business, with all its assets and liabilities, was taken over by a new firm having the same business name. The assessees share in this partnership firm was 40 per cent. The assessee claimed depreciation and investment allowance as deduction against the profits from the proprietary business, which was carried on during the part of the year. The assessees claim was rejected by the Assessing Officer. The CIT (Appeals) allowed the assessees appeal holding that the assessee was entitled to both investment









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top