SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 685

B.C.PATEL, SHARAD D.DAVE
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
SOLANKI BALVANTSINH SHANABHAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: R.C.KODEKAR, VIJAY N.RAVAL

B. C. PATEL, J.

( 1 ) ADMIT. Learned Advocate Mr. Vijay N Raval appears for the respondents in all matters and waives service of process of admission.

( 2 ) THE learned A. G. P. appearing in the matters contended that there is a limited challenge to the award made by the Special Land Acquisition Officer with regard to the determination of price. That award was based on the record produced before the Court vide exh. 19. The learned advocate for the respondents appearing in the matters submitted that the matters are required to be disposed of on this short point and no further points are to be urged and therefore we are disposing of the matters finally at this stage.

( 3 ) NOTIFICATIONS under Sec. 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was published on 19. 9. 91. The agricultural lands situated at village Katol, Taluka : Kalol, District : Panchmahals were to be acquired. There is no dispute with regard to the procedure followed by the Land Acquisition Officer in accordance with law while acquiring the land and therefore the same is not required to be considered and referred save and except that the Land Acquisition Officer offered an amount of Rs.







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top