SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 721

R.M.DOSHIT
ATMARAMBHAI MAGANLAL PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.D.OZA, K.S.JAVERI, R.S.SANJANWALA, TUSHAR MEHTA

R. M. DOSHIT, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned advocates.

( 2 ) THE petitioners are some of the Members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Vijapur (hereinafter referred to as the said Committee ). The petitioners seek declaration that the respondent nos. 8 and 10, the Members of the said Committee nominated under Clauses (iv) and (v) of sub section (1) of Section 11 of the Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), do not have a right to vote at the election of the Chairman and the Vice Chairman, the respondent nos. 7 and 11 respectively, of the said Committee.

( 3 ) MR. MEHTA has submitted that at the election of the Chairman and the Vice Chairman of the said Committee, the nominated members of the said Committee had cast their votes which has tilted the balance. He has submitted that the nominated members of the said Committee had no right to cast their votes at the election of the Chairman and the Vice Chairman. He has submitted that, it is the elected members alone who have right to contest at the election of the Chairman and the Vice Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee and the voting rights at such election shall also be







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top