SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 759

J.R.VORA
DHARMESH NANNU NITINBHAI SHAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.C.DAVE, B.Y.MANKAD

J. R. VORA, J.

( 1 ) ). THIS Revision Application is filed against the order passed by learned City Sessions Judge, Court No. 2 below Application Exh. 3 in Session Case No. 207 of 2000 by which learned Addl. Sessions Judge rejected application Exh. 3 filed by some of the accused including present petitioner for discharging them for the offences for which charge sheet is submitted against them.

( 2 ) AS per the brief facts of the case against about as many as 14 to 16 accused including present petitioner accused No. 9, DCB Police Station submitted a charge sheet for the offences punishable under Sections 120 (B), 121, 121 (A), 122, 123, 212 and under Section 25 (1), (A), (E) and 27 of the Arms Act in pursuance of Crime Register No. I-4/2000. Complaint of which came to be filed on 20th January, 2000. Though name of the present petitioner is not disclosed in the FIR, whose involvement was discovered during the course of investigation. As per the brief facts of the case sought to be made out against the accused including present petitioner, serious charges are being levelled. It is alleged that the accused in the said case are the members of Babar Khalsa group and they planned criminal



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top