SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 848

D.M.DHARMADHIKARI, K.A.PUJ
GUJARAT STEEEL TUBE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PORT OF KANDLA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ASPI M.KAPADIA, S.B.VAKIL, SHAILESH BRAHMBHATT

D. M. DHARMADHIKARI, J.

( 1 ) THESE writ petitions have been filed by the petitioner-Gujarat Steel Tubes Limited aggrieved by rejection of their application filed under section 55 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 (for short "the Act") for refund of alleged excess wharfage charges paid on steel coils and uncoated pipes under mistake,to the respondent Kandla Port Trust. The sole ground of rejection of the refund claim is that it is barred by limitation being beyond the prescribed period of six months under section 55 of the Act.

( 2 ) THE petitioners case is that in accordance with notification dated 26. 6. 1975 issued by the Kandla Port Trust under section 48 of the Act read with section 52 , wharfage at the rate of Rs. 12. 00 per 1000 Kgs. under Entry 44 (i)- Metal and Metal products, not otherwise specified was required to be charged from the petitioner. But excess wharfage at the rate of Rs. 21. 60 per 1000 Kgs. under Entry 75 `unspecified items heavy lifts each weighing 3 tons or above, has been charged from it. The petitioners further case is that excess wharfage was paid under mistake for various periods. At the time of hearing of these petitions, learned counsel for the peti























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top