SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 68

D.A.MEHTA, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
SIDHPUR TALUKA CO OPERATIVE PURCHASE AND SALES UNION – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.D.OZA, K.G.VAKHARIA, K.S.JAVERI, TUSHAR MEHTA

D. M. DHARMADHIKARI, D. A. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) IN these three Petitions pertaining to election to Federal-cum-Specified Cooperative Societies of Siddhpur and Patan Talukas, a common question of law has been raised and therefore they are being decided by this Common Judgment.

( 2 ) THIS would require examination of the scheme of the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act, 1961 and the Rules framed thereunder (hereinafter referred to as `the Act and `the Rules) as also the bye-laws of the two Taluka Societies - Siddhpur and Patan, before us.

( 3 ) ONLY few necessary facts are required to be stated at the outset. In the year 1997, the Revenue Department of the State of Gujarat bifurcated certain Districts and Talukas by creating new Districts and new Talukas. Under the aforesaid bifurcation, the State Government created a new District Patan carving out some villages from Mehsana District. The State Government also excluded some of the villages forming part of Siddhpur Revenue Taluka and included them in a newly formed Unjha Taluka. As a result of this bifurcation for creation of new District and Talukas, 27 primary societies affiliated to Siddhpur Taluka Cooperative Society, now fall within the























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top