SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 212

M.S.SHAH
SURSANGJI AMBARAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.PATEL, J.M.PATEL

M. S. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) BOTH these petitions are directed against the judgment and order dated 7. 8. 2001 passed by a Division bench of the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal ("the Tribunal" for brevity) in Revision Application No. TEN. B. A. 27/2001 under the provisions of Section 76 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 ("the Act" for brevity ).

( 2 ) BY the impugned judgment the Tribunal has set aside the judgment and order dated 25/10/2000 passed by Mr. S. G. Bharwad Deputy Collector (Land Reforms and Appeals), Ahmedabad in an appeal which was preferred after delay of 40 years against the order of the Mamlatdar passed in the year 1960. EARLIER, against the same order, occupants of the land (petitioners in Special Civil Application. No. 3340/2002) had filed revision application after 34 years under Section 76 A of the Act. That revision application was allowed by the Deputy Collector on 4/4/95. When a revision application was filed by the State Government against the said order dated 4/4/95 before the Tribunal, the occupants filed a note for taking up the matter for immediate hearing and at the hearing of the revision application submitted a purshis (a note in writing), giving





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top