KSHITIJ R. VYAS, RAVI R. TRIPATHI, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant (original accused no. 1 and 3), in this appeal, have challenged the judgment and order dated 17. 12. 1998 passed in Sessions Case No. 94 of 1993 by the learned Addl. City Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad. The learned judge, at the end of the trial, convicted the appellants for offence punishable under section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and sentenced them to suffer R. I. for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1 lac, in default, to undergo R. I. for one year. As far as original accused no. 2 is concerned, according to the learned judge, his case fell under section 27 of the Act as small quantity of narcotic substance was found from his possession which was intended for his personal consumption and not for sale. He, therefore, gave benefit under section 27 of the Act to the original accused no. 2 and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 1500. 00, in default, to undergo imprisonment a prescribed under the law.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case can briefly be stated as under: police Constable Narendrasinh Vijaysinh, PW 3 Ex. 19 of Madhupura Police Station, while performing his duties on 12. 12. 1992 at S. K. Lokhandwala Communal Point, received a secret information in the morning from the secret informant that " one person, since last 4 /5 days, between 9. 15 a. m. and10. 45 p. m. , sells padikis (very small pouch) of opium, charas or brown sugar, outside Prem Darwaja, Dariapur. " The informant had shown the accused person to Police Constable Narendrasinh from distance. PSI M. S. Patel, PW 7 Ex. 15 and PI B. S. Shukla, PW 4 Ex. 21, while on patrolling, came to Lokhandwala compound in the evening. Narendrasinh sent the aforesaid secret information to them. Narendrasinh made a note of receipt of secret information vide Ex. 68. Thereafter, Narendrasinh, PSI Mr. Patel and Mr. Shukla went to Madhupura Police Station and reduced the said information in writing in the station diary at Madhupura Police Station vide Ex. 37. The said information was conveyed to Police Superintendent on telephone and thereafter necessary arrangements were made for the raid. Panchas were called and statement of Narendrasinh was recorded by PSI Mr. Patel. Constable Bharatkumar was asked to call goldsmith to weigh the substance if any found. Thereafter, PSI Patel, PI Shukla, Head Constable Fatesinh, Constable Narendrasinh, Lady Constable Anuben, Constable Udaykumar proceeded for raid from Madhupura Police Station. When they came near Prem Darwaja chowky, near Bhagwati Mill Compound footpath, Constable Narendrasinh identified the persons from distance. Two accused persons were exchanging something and at that relevant point of time, the raid was carried out and two accused persons were caught hold of. On interrogation during the raid, it was found that one of the accused persons was Pirubhai Shaikh, the appellant no. 1 and the second person was Bharatkumar Darbar, the accused no. 2. Before carrying out physical search, the accused persons were asked as to whether they wanted to be searched in presence of a Magistrate or not. Vide Ex. . 56 and 57, both the accused persons were given option to be searched in presence of a Magistrate. However, the said option was not availed of by the accused and, therefore, A/1 and A/2 were searched in presence of PI Shukla who was a gazetted officer and the panchas. During search of the accused persons, five small padikis were found from the possession of A/2. During raid, one padiki was opened and brown sugar was found therein. Therefore, A/1 was further interrogated. During interrogation of accused persons, further raid was continued as police went to corner of Vaghari Vas, near Ray Basera School. There, a woman, appellant no. 2 (original accused no. 3) sitting on the footpath, on seeing the police, tried to run away. However, she was caught hold by woman constable Anuben. She carried out the search of A/3 and four s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document