SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 451

B.J.SHETHNA
HIRBAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: N.D.NANAVATI, P.R.ABICHANDANI

B. J. SHETHNA, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Shri P. R. Abichandani, learned A. P. P. waives service of Rule in both matters.

( 2 ) BAIL Application i. e. Criminal Misc. Application No. 3686 of 2002 is filed by the present applicants accused who are father-in-law and brother-in-law of deceased Zarina. They are aged 75 and 24 years respectively. They are Muslims. Earlier Bail Application i. e. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 1889 of 2002 filed by the same accused was withdrawn with liberty to file fresh bail application after receipt of "visera Report". Visera Report shows that there was no poisoning. After receipt of the Visera Report (Annexure : C) the applicant - accused first approached the learned trial Judge by way of Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 78 of 2002 filed by the co-accused Hirbai @ Hanifaben, mother-in-law of deceased came to be dismissed by common judgment and order dated 3. 6. 2002 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Morbi. Accused Hirbai @ Hanifaben filed above bail application before this Court i. e. Criminal miscellaneous Application No. 3685 of 2002.

( 3 ) LEARNED Senior Advocate Shri N. D. Nanavati appearing for the applicant - accused in both Criminal














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top