Gujarat High Court
Judgename :A.M.KAPADIA
APTECH LIMITED - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
CRI.M.A. 8273 of 2001
Decided On : 07/19/2002
Negotiable Instruments Act - Section 138 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Petition which is filed against whom Criminal complaint is filed in Court of chief Metropolitan Magistrate in which process has been issued have prayed to quash and set aside said complaint and process issued on grounds stated in petition - Private complaint came to be filed in Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate by respondent Securities Limited against petitioner Attach Limited its Directors and authorized signatory for commission of alleged offence - As per terms of franchise agreement entire amount collected by Asset International Center towards fees was first sent to along with all necessary details and particulars - It is further averred in complaint that accused is Chairman of accused are Directors of accused are Executive Directors accused is authorized signatory of accused and they are in charge and responsible to conduct of business and all accused are responsible for day-to-day conduct and affairs at time offence was committed and therefore all accused have committed a criminal offence – Held, This Court entertained petition on and while issuing notice ad-interim relief was granted and from that day onwards ad-interim relief was operating in favor of petitioners and against respondent - It is equally true that complaint filed for commission of offence of Act is an extraordinary speedy remedy which was enacted with laudable object that debts may be recovered by creditor as early as possible - Besides this Court has rejected petition merely by following latest pronouncements of Supreme Court on law of quashment of complaint - It is made clear that none of observations made by this Court while deciding this petition shall be construed as an expression of opinion on merits or demerits of case - Magistrate before whom matter comes up for trial shall decide same in accordance with law and uninfluenced by fact that petitioners had filed petition for quashment of complaint and same has been rejected by this Court – Petition dismissed (Paras 33 and 35)
( 1 ) IN this petition which is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Code for short hereinafter), petitioners against whom Criminal complaint No. 918 of 2001 is filed in the Court of learned chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad in which the process has been issued, have prayed to quash and set aside the said complaint and process issued thereunder on the grounds stated in the petition.
( 2 ) A private complaint came to be filed in the Court of learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad by respondent No. 2, GDR Securities Limited (hereinafter referred to "gdr" for the sake of brevity and convenience) against petitioner No. 1, Aptech Limited (hereinafter referred to as "aptech" for the sake of brevity and convenience), its Directors and authorized signatory for commission of the alleged offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (the Act for short hereinafter ). 2 (i) it is inter alia alleged in the said complaint by the complainant - respondent No. 2 herein "gdr" that the complainant had entered into a franchise agreement with Aptech dated 21. 9. 1996 and in pursuance of the said agreement, GDR had started Asset International Center at B-61, Pariseema Complex, C. G. Road, Near Lal Bungalow, Ahmedabad. As per the terms of the franchise agreement dated 21. 9. 1996, the entire amount collected by the Asset International Center towards the fees was first sent to Aptech alongwith all necessary details and particulars. Aptech and their auditor, after verifying and checking the details of the accounts submitted by GDR, used to retain 20% of the total amount and issued cheque in the name of GDR for the balance 80% of the amount. 2 (ii) aptech started indulging into financial irregularities and acting contrary to the terms of franchise agreement dated 21. 9. 1996 and, therefore, Director of GDR personally visited the Regional Office of Aptech at Vadodara on 24. 7. 2001 to get the details of the amount due and payable by Aptech to GDR as per the terms of franchise agrement dated 21. 9. 1996. Aptech supplied the statement of accounts of GDR wherein it was found that an amount of Rs. 33,13,634. 07 paise was outstanding due and payable by Aptech to GDR as on 24. 7. 2001. Aptech not only supplied the statements of accounts to GDR but also verified and confirmed the details of the outstanding dues of Rs. 33,13,634. 07 paise as mentioned in the said statement of accounts. In other words, Aptech admitted and accepted its liability of Rs. 33,13,634. 07 paise which was outstanding due and payable to GDR. 2 (iii) it is further case of the complainant GDR that Aptech issued a cheque dated 24. 7. 2001 bearing No. 825749 drawn on Dena Bank, Law College Branch, Ahmedabad in favour of the complainant GDR towards the outstanding dues. The said cheque was presented for encashment in the Central Bank of India, Gandhi Road Branch, Ahmedabad on 14. 8. 2001 and to the utter shock and surprise of GDR the said cheque was returned dishonoured on 17. 8. 2001 with an endorsement "account closed". It is further averred in the complaint that accused No. 2 is the Chairman of Aptech, accused Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 are Directors of Aptech, accused Nos. 8 and 9 are Executive Directors, accused No. 10 is the authorised signatory of accused No. 1 Aptech and they are in charge and responsible to Aptech for the conduct of business of Aptech and all the accused are responsible for day-to-day conduct and affairs of Aptech at the time the offence was committed and, therefore, all the accused have committed a criminal offence under section 138 of the Act. 2 (iv) gdr had addressed a statutory notice to each of the accused under section 138 of the Act on 29. 8. 2001 and the same was sent by Registered Post A. D. Despite service of notice to each of the accused, no amount has been paid to GDR. It is further averred that instead of making the payment of the amount of cheque on receipt of statutory notice by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.