SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 467

J.N.PATEL
SURESHBHAI BABUBHAI SUNARA – Appellant
Versus
AHMEDABAD DISTRICT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ASHOK L.CHANDAK, K.G.VAKHARIA, M.M.TIRMIZI, TUSHAR MEHTA

JAYANT PATEL, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Mr. K. G. Vakharia, Ld. Sr. Counsel appearing for Mr. Tushar Mehta for the respondent No. 1 waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No. 1 and Mr. Dabhi, Ld. AGP appears and waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No. 2. With the consent of parties matter is taken up for final hearing today.

( 2 ) THE present petition is preferred by the petitioners who are claiming to be the members of Vatva Kadamgiri Coop. Hsg. Society Ltd (hereinafter referred to as "the society") against the order dated 17. 8. 01 passed by the Gujarat State Cooperative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "the tribunal") in Lavad Appeal No. 68/00.

( 3 ) THE short facts of the case are that the petitioners are the members of Vatva Kadamgiri Coop. Hsg. Society Ltd. The case of the petitioners is that the erstwhile organiser and the developer of the society, namely, Naranbhai Pandya and others had obtained the loan of Rs. 18,13,000. 00 from the respondent No. 1-Bank, and the further case of the petitioners is that the erstwhile Organiser had the dummy members in the society. It is the case of the petitioner that they have become members of the society in the year 1990 where
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top