SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 505

D.A.MEHTA
SHRIRAM OIL CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.D.OZA, J.S.Yadav, KAVITA YADAV, R.C.Jani, R.M.CHHAYA

D. A. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) MR. YADAV seeks permission to amend petitions in Special Civil Application Nos. 3518, 3519,3520 of 2002 as per draft amendment. Permission granted.

( 2 ) RULE. Mr. A. D. Oza, learned Government Pleader appears and waives service of Rule.

( 3 ) IN this group of petitions the issue involved being common, by consent of the respective Advocates appearing on behalf of different petitioners and the learned Government Pleader they have been heard together and are disposed off by this common judgment and order.

( 4 ) THE petitioners in this batch of petitions have been doing the business of selling Kerosene as wholesale dealers after obtaining licence under the Gujarat Essential Articles (Licence, Control and Stock Declaration) Order,1981 (hereinafter referred to as order, 1981 ). It appears that on 31/12/2001 the Government of Gujarat published an Order by Notification in the Government Gazette. The said order reads as under:"food CIVIL SUPPLIES and CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT Order Sachivalaya, Gandhinagar, 31/12/2001. NO. GTH/2001/30/ksn/1294/3515/part/b. In view of the judgment delivered by the Division Bench of Hon. Gujarat High Court in various LPAs filed by Grou

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top