SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 575

A.M.KAPADIA
S. G. MUNIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.B.PARDIWALA, K.B.ANANDJIVALA, K.C.SHAH, YOGESH S.LAKHANI

A. M. KAPADIA, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Mr. K. C. Shah, learned APP appears and waives the service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent No. 1 whereas Mr. Yogesh Lakhani, learned advocate appears and waives the service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent No. 2.

( 2 ) BY means of filing this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Code for short), petitioners who are Police Officials at the relevant time serving in District Kachchh at Bhuj, have prayed to quash and set aside the Criminal Complaint bearing Inquiry Case No. 72 of 1999 arising out of M. Case No. 21 of 1999 of Bhuj Town Police Station and also prayed to quash and set aside the judgment and order dated 11/10/2001 passed in Criminal Revision Petition No. 2 of 2001 by the learned Sessions Judge, Kachchh at Bhuj and also the order dated December 30, 2000 passed in M. Case No. 21 of 1999 (Criminal Inquiry No. 72 of 1999) by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Kachchh at Bhuj rejecting "c" Summary report filed by the investigating officer and taking cognizance of offence u/s. 306 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code (ipc for short) against the petitioners.

( 3 ) THE brief facts giving rise to this



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top