SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 634

RAVI R.TRIPATHI
GOHIL AMARSING GOVINDBHAI – Appellant
Versus
SHAH MANSUKHLAL CHHAGANLAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: JITENDRA M.PATEL, R.N.SHAH

RAVI R. TRIPATHI, J.

( 1 ) THE present Second Appeal is filed being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the judgement and decree dated 31/03/1978 passed in Civil Appeal No. 40 of 1977 by the learned 2nd Extra Assistant Judge, Baroda, whereby the appeal was dismissed and the judgement and decree passed in Regular Civil Suit No. 222 of 1973 by the learned Civil Judge (J. D.), Karjan, dated 18th December, 1976 was confirmed.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff, respondent herein, filed Regular Civil Suit No. 222 of 1973 to get the possession of the suit house from the defendant, appellant herein. It is the case of the plaintiff that he had good relations with the defendant and his family members from the time of deceased father of the defendant. As the plaintiff was in need of money, he demanded from the defendant. The defendant told the plaintiff to execute `an agreement to sale of his house situated at "brahman Vaas" at Village Dethan. On 29/12/1962, a document was executed wherein it is mentioned that the house of the plaintiff, having tin sheets along with "vada" is agreed to be sold for a sum of Rs. 1,200=00; and, that Rs. 900=00 is paid as "bana" amount and when the remaining amount is paid, the plain
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top