SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 657

Y.B.BHATT
BHAGWANBHAI RAGHUNATHBHAI CHAUDDHARY – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT PRIMARY EDUCATION OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: H.D.Dave, H.S.MUNSHAW, SHALINI S.MAIR

Y. B. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, though styled as a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, for enforcement of fundamental rights under Article 14 of the Constitution. 1. 1 the petitioner herein challenges the order of termination of service of the petitioner passed by the District Primary Education Officer, ultimately confirmed in appeal by the Director of Primary Education. Obviously, therefore, this is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution since the petitioner challenges the orders passed by the statutory authorities in the performance of their quasi-judicial functions. 1. 2. BEFORE proceeding further on the merits of the matter it is desirable to keep in mind the observations of the Supreme Court in the case of (i) Mohmmad Yunus Vs. Mohammad Mustaqim (AIR 1984 SC 38, (ii) Khalil Ahmed Bashir Vs. Tufelhussein S. Sarangpurwala (AIR 1988 SC 184) and (iii) Ashok Kumar Vs. Sita Ram (2001 (4) SCC 478) on the question of the scope and ambit of the jurisdiction of this Court in the context of the powers which this Court may exercise under Article 227 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court has observed in the afor















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top