H.H.MEHTA
BABUBHAI H. KANADA – Appellant
Versus
NATWARLAL CHANDARANA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE original revision petitioners of Civil Revision Application No. 348 of 1988 decided by this Court, have by preferring this application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 requested this Court to condone the delay of 440 days for filing a proposed Review Petition under Section 114 of the Civil Procedure Code, read with Order, 47, Rule-1 of the Civil Procedure Code, being Misc. Civil Application [stamp] No. 2140 of 2001.
( 2 ) THE present petitioners and opponent Nos. 2 and 3 being tenants were the original defendants in original Regular Civil Suit [rent Suit] No. 345 of 1981 before the trial Court. The opponent No. 1 being Landlord was a plaintiff in the said suit. [the parties before this Court will be referred to as the plaintiff and defendants respectively hereinafter for the sake of convenience]. The plaintiff filed one Regular Civil Suit [rent Suit] No. 345 of 1981 in the Small Causes Court, at Rajkot on 16/12/1981, against the defendants for decree of eviction and also to recover the physical possession of the suit premises along with a prayer for money decree to recover Rs. 2,697. 64 paisa [rupees Two Thousand Six Hundred Ninety Seven and Sixt
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.