SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 649

P.B.MAJMUDAR
Dhiren Baxi – Appellant
Versus
Regional Passport Officer – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: MRUGAN PUROHIT, P.J.DAVAWALA

P. B. MAJMUDAR, J.

( 1 ) ). The petitioner has filed this petition under article 226 of the Constitution of india, challenging the directions issues by the Passport Authority in its communication dated 8. 1. 1999 as well as for quashing and setting aside the decision of the Passport Authority in not issuing passport to the petitioner.

( 2 ) ). The petitioner is a practising Char tared Accountant. Since he was desirous of having a passport, he made an application on 10 3. 1999, with all necessary papers. At the time of processing the passport application, the authority found that Some criminal complaints are pending against the petitioner. The petitioner was asked by the Authority to the produce the copy of the judgment and the said information was called for from the petitioner by way of letter dated 21st April, 1997. The petitioner was informed that if he failed to produce such copy, the case of the petitioner will be treated as closed. The authority has informed the petitioner to produce copy of the Courts judgment on the ground that criminal complaints are filed against the petitioner, which are registered as Crime Register I Nos. 3 of 1997, 4 of 1997 and 6 of 1997. At the releva














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top