SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 732

DEV KANT TRIVEDI, H.H.MEHTA
DINESH DHIMETRAY MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.M.DESAI, B.S.SUPEHIA, K.P.RAVAL

D. K. TRIVEDI, H. H. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) THE original accused of N. D. P. S. Case No. 3 of 1998, which came to be decided and disposed by the learned Special Judge, Vadodara of the Special Court constituted under Section 36-A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 has, by filing this appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 [for short "cr. P. C. ] read with Section 36-B of the N. D. P. S. Act, 1985 [for short "n. D. P. S. Act"] challenged the correctness and legality of the judgment Ex. 48 dated 30/12/2000 of conviction and sentence rendered by the said learned Special Judge, Vadodara in aforesaid case namely N. D. P. S. Case No. 3 of 1998, whereby the present appellant has been convicted under Section 235 (2) of the Cr. P. C. for an offence punishable under Section 20 (b) (i) of the N. D. P. S. Act and sentenced to undergo R. I. for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000. 00[rupees One Lacs Only] and in default to undergo further simple imprisonment for one year.

( 2 ) AS per the complaint Ex. 27 lodged by Shri D. S. Deol, Police Inspector, J. P. Road Police Station, Vadodara City, the case of prosecution in a nutshell is as follows:-[2
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top