SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 723

K.M.MEHTA
AVENTS PASTUER S. A. – Appellant
Versus
CADILA PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.M.DESAI, Amar Gupta, D.S.NANAVATI, MAYANK BUCH, PRANAV G.DESAI, S.B.VAKIL, S.N.SHELAT, SUDHIR NANAVATI

K. M. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) AVENTIS Pasteur S. A.- appellant - original opponent has filed this appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Arbitration Act) against the order dated 16. 9. 2002 passed by the learned City Civil Court, Ahmedabad in Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 499 of 2002 - an Application under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act Order below Exh. 1. The learned judge by his impugned order held that it requires proper consideration that how and when such Distribution Agreement can be terminated by either of the parties and with what effect. The learned judge further held that till final determination and conclusion of the point raised by the petitioner- M/s. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd.-original applicant (respondent in appeal) in the main petition, it would be appropriate to restrain the opponent from enforcing or implementing the termination notice dated 18. 3. 2002, the right of the petitioner to safeguard its interest in the subject matter would be frustrated. Thereafter the court granted further relief that in the circumstances the petitioner files an undertaking to the aforesaid extent, then the office is dire













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top