SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 811

M.S.SHAH
ANITA BHANDARI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: P.J.DAVAWALA, PARITOSH CALLA, PRASHANT DESAI

M. S. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Ms PJ Davawala, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the Union of India and Mr Prashant G Desai, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 4 waive service of Rule.

( 2 ) PETITIONER No. 1 is the widow and petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are minor children (aged 9 and 2 years respectively) of late Shri Suresh M Bhandari. The deceased was a Chartered Accountant practising at Surat. The deceased had also filed the income-tax return for the year ended on 31. 3. 2000 (AY 2000-01) wherein his income from profession was shown as Rs. 2,21,610. 00. 2. 2 on 4. 4. 2001, the deceased had gone to Dena Bank, Surat for a banking transaction but he was shot dead by Mr Nagjibhai Kanjibhai Parmar, an employee of Dena Bank working as a security guard, which was a rash and reckless act in course of his employment. The deceased died on the spot on account of the fire arm wound on the chest of the deceased. 2. 3 it appears that on account of the tragic incident, the bank on humanitarian grounds was inclined to offer employment to petitioner No. 1-widow of the deceased by offering her a job at Jodhpur where the petitioners are now residing after the tragic incident. However, when the b


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top