SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 828

K.M.MEHTA
Payalben Jayeshbhai Yagnik – Appellant
Versus
Jayeshbhai G. Yagnik – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.R.PATEL, MAULIK J.SHELAT, MEGHA JANI

E. M. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) ). Payalben Jayeshbhai Yagnik, appellant - original applicant has filed this appeal against the judgment and order dated 30th November, 2001, passed by the motor Accident Claims Tribunal, ahmedabad in M. A. C. P. No. 11/2000 The learned Judge by his impugned judgment was pleased to reject the said application which has been filed under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

( 2 ) ). The facts giving rise to this petition are as under:2. 1 The applicant has filed application under Section 140 of the Act to get the compensation amount on the principle of no fault liability. In the said application, it was submitted that on 18th November, 1999, the petitioner met with the accident on the four cross road near Ashwamegh travels which is situated on the roads proceeding ahead from Vadilal Hospital towards Paldi. The petitioner had suffered grievous injuries and suffered fracture on right leg and she had taken treatment at dr. Mukesh R. Shahs Orthopaedic Hospital. She has put reliance on the treatment papers issued by the said Doctor, She further submitted the registration number of vehicle which is involved in the accident








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top