SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 818

D.A.MEHTA, H.H.MEHTA, J.N.BHATT
P. V. JOSHEPH CHRISTIAN – Appellant
Versus
DEENAMMA JOSHEPH CHRISTIAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: W.A.URAIZI

J. N. BHATT, H. H. MEHTA, D. A. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) A short, but interesting question which has been put in focus, for our consideration and adjudication in this reference, under Section 17 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 [ the Act ] by the District Court , Ahmedabad rural at Mirzapur Court, arising out of Civil Suit No. 3 of 1997 instituted for dissolution of marriage under Section 10, on the ground of respondent-wife being guilty of adultery and passing of decree for dissolution of marriage is whether, the factual profile and the evidence on record constitutes a legal launching pad for passing of decree for dissolution or not ?.

( 2 ) IN order to examine and satisfy our conscience, we have thought it expedient to have a close scrutiny of relevant and material factual matrix, giving rise to the reference under Section 17 of the Act, as it stood then before amendment. Short conspectus of facts, therefore, may be high lighted at this juncture.

( 3 ) IN this reference for confirmation of the decree for dissolution of marriage, arising out of a Civil Suit No. 3 of 1997 for decree under Section 10 by the original petitioner- plaintiff husband, on the ground of respondent-- original defendan















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top