SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 879

J.N.PATEL
VALSAD DISTRICT CENTRAL CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.M.MANGUKIYA, KAMAL TRIVEDI, P.S.CHAMPANERI

JAYANT PATEL, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Mr. Vakharia, learned Sr. Counsel, and Mr. N. D. Nanavati, learned Sr. Counsel appearing with Mr. Mangukia, learned Counsel in SCA No. 10967/2001, SCA No. 10968/2001 and SCA No. 11753/2001, Mr. P. M. Raval, learned Sr. Counsel appearing with Mr. Champaneri in SCA No. 2056/2002 and SCA No. 2257/2002 and Mr. Jhaveri, learned Counsel appearing in SCA No. 2033/2002. On behalf of the concerned Government authority as well as the other, including the Registrar and the Election Officer, Mr. K. B. Trivedi, learned Addl. Advocate General appearing with the learned GP is heard.

( 2 ) IT has been submitted by the aforesaid advocates that wherever their clients are either petitioners or respondents in the aforesaid group of petitions, the very submission may be treated as made for their respective clients and they have made their submissions for final disposal of the all petitions and, therefore, they may be disposed of accordingly by the common judgement finally.

( 3 ) IN all these petitions, the facts are interconnected and common and interconnected questions are involved regarding amendment in the bye-laws of Valsad District Central Cooperative Bank Limited (here























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top