SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 867

H.H.MEHTA, J.N.BHATT
GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
HATHIBHAI SENGHABHAI RUPPURA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: HIMANSU M.PADHYA, MONALI H.BHATT

J. N. BHATT, H. H. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) ADMIT. Service of notice of admission is waived by Mr. H. M. Padhya learned advocate for and on behalf of the respondents. In view of the peculiar facts of the case and short question involved in the case as well as upon joint request of the learned advocates for the parties, we have taken up this appeal today, for final hearing.

( 2 ) THE short question which requires to be determined and adjudicated upon is as to whether the amount of compensation awarded by the Workman Compensation Commissioner under the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 is required to be slashed from the amount of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), District Banaskantha, Palanpur in the case of fatal injuries on account of the vehicular accident, for which as such there is consensus even amongst the lawyers appearing for the parties. Therefore, the amount which has been awarded under Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 by the Workmen Commissioner for the death of the employee is required to be slashed down from the amount of compensation due and payable under the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.

( 3 ) THE appellant - Gujarat State Road Transpo






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top