SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 95

J.R.VORA
LEGAL HEIRS and REP. OF DECD. AMRUTABEN BUDHAJI THAKORE – Appellant
Versus
NITABEN SOMABHAI PATEL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.C.DAVE

J. R. VORA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Mr. D. C. Dave, learned advocate for the petitioner.

( 2 ) THIS Revision Application is filed against the order passed by the learned Small Causes Judge, Ahmedabad in H. R. P. Suit No. 1993/1993 on 29th day of November, 2002 below an application Exh. 74 filed by the present petitioner, i. e. original defendants of the said Civil Suit under Order 32, Rule 2 and 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

( 3 ) AS per the brief facts one Nitaben Somabhai Patel, plaintiff No. 1 and Vishnubhai Somabhai Patel, plaintiff No. 2, both jointly filed the abovesaid rent suit against the present petitioner for the arrears of rent, as well as for eviction. In the abovesaid suit, at the stage of recording of evidence, an application Exh. 74 was preferred by the present petitioner stating that as a Power of Attorney holder of Nitaben, plaintiff No. 2 Vishnubhai has maintained the abovesaid suit and entered in the witness box. Right from the filing the suit, defendants have declared that plaintiff No. 1 is of unsound mind and therefore, plaintiff No. 1, Nitaben cannot maintain the suit and plaintiff No. 2, Vishnubhai, in capacity of Power of Attorney holder of plaintiff No. 1 also










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top