SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 124

SHARAD D.DAVE, K.R.VYAS
JAVANTIBEN BHIKAJI THAVERACHA – Appellant
Versus
RANGABEN MANAJI THAVERACHA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: C.L.SONI, MEHUL H.RATHOD, PREMAL R.JOSHI

KSHITIJ R. VYAS, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Mr. C. L. Soni, learned Counsel waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent No. 1 and Mr. Premal Joshi, learned AGP waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent No. 2.

( 2 ) WITH the consent of learned Counsel appearing for the parties, this petition is heard today finally.

( 3 ) THE petitioner, in this petition, has challenged the order dated 28th January 2003 passed by the learned Civil Judge (JD), Tharad, below application Exh. 10 in Election Petition No. 2 of 2002, whereby the said application was allowed and recounting was ordered during the pendency of the election petition.

( 4 ) THE general election of Krial Gram Panchayat was held on 23rd December 2001. After the election, the petitioner was declared elected as Sarpanch on a seat exclusively reserved for lady candidate by two votes. It is the case of the petitioner that respondent No. 1 was also a candidate for the post of Sarpanch of the Panchayat. The counting was scheduled on 26th December 2001. A total of 690 votes were cast and during the counting, the petitioner got 317 votes and respondent No. 1 got 326 votes and 47 votes were kept aside as doubtful votes for acceptance. It is fur









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top