SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 183

DEV KANT TRIVEDI, K.M.MEHTA
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF AHMEDABAD – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.N.Patel, PRASHANT DESAI

K. M. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) AHMEDABAD Municipal Corporation - appellant original plaintiff has filed this appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 26th February, 1982, in Civil Suit No. 2680 of 1977 filed by the plaintiff. The learned Judge by his impugned judgment has held that the Union of India - the defendant is exempted from liability of incremental contribution under the provisions of the Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as `the said Act ).

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this appeal are as under:- 2. 1 the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation - plaintiff had filed a Civil Suit No. 2680 of 1977 before the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, and prayed for a decree that defendant Union of India be directed to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs. 1,03,139. 25p. 00 with 6% interest from the date of the suit till the payment and costs. The said amount represents "incremental contribution" levied by the plaintiff under the provisions of the said Act. 2. 2 mr. P. G. Desai, learned counsel has referred to plaint and other documents in connection with Town Planning Scheme, Ahmedabad 15 and made following submissions on facts: 2. 2











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top