SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 328

A.L.DAVE, J.N.BHATT
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMOANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
CHANDULAL GOKALDAS MEHTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.PATEL, P.V.NANAVATI

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) IN both these appeals, common questions are involved and they arise out of common judgment an award. Upon joint request, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) A claim petition came to be filed by the heirs and legal representatives, original-petitioners, appellants in First Appeal No. 241 of 1992, inter alia, contending that they lost their bread-winner in a road accident which occurred on 4. 1. 88. The deceased was travelling on a scooter bearing No. GUJ-982 on National Highway No. 8 near Dabhan and was driving his scooter in slow speed on the correct side. At that time, original opponent No. 1, Shanabhai Prajapati, driving Matador-Tempo bearing No. GRW-2, came with excessive speed and dashed with the scooter on the wrong side, as a result of which deceased Yogesh Chandulal Mehta, sustained serious injuries and succumbed to the same during the course of treatment. Original opponent No. 1, Shanabhai was the driver, original opponent No. 2, Ishwarbhai Prajapati was the owner of the vehicle and original No. 3, United India Insurance Company was the insurer of the offending Matador-Tempo.

( 3 ) THE deceased was doing the business of engraving a















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top