SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 411

K.A.PUJ
SATYANARAYAN B. SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
A. L. DINEU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: BAIJU JOSHI, BIPIN I.MEHTA, KANAN R.SHAH, PRACHHAK, R.D.RAVAL, RAVINDRA SHAH, SHIRISH JOSHI

K. A. PUJ, J.

( 1 ) SPECIAL Civil Application No. 4653 of 2003 is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dtd. 01. 04. 2003 passed by the Gujarat State Cooperative Tribunal, Ahmedabad in Revision Application No. 94/2003 reversing the order passed by the Board of Nominees Court, Ahmedabad below an application Exh. 6 in Lavad Case No. 1979/2002 on 20. 08. 2002.

( 2 ) SPECIAL Civil Application No. 5964/2003 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking prayer for quashing and setting aside the action of the respondent Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (B. S. N. L.) and respondent No. 3 of attempting to install a telephone exchange in the residential society contrary to law based on the order alleged to have been obtained by misrepresentation and bogus documents. The petitioner has also prayed for the direction to the District Registrar (Rural) of the Cooperative Societies to produce the copies of the Audit Reports, remarks, records pertaining to the office bearers of the society, which were available on his record and to state as to what action was taken or proposed to be taken against the disqualified defaulter office bearers for usurpin





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top