SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 402

J.N.PATEL
AMRUTA VIJAY VORA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.N.Patel, KANAN R.SHAH, N.J.SHAH, RAVINDRA SHAH

J. N. PATEL, J.

( 1 ) MR. N. J. SHAH for Mr. D. N. Patel waives service of rule on behalf of respondent-passport authorities. Respondent No. 2-Ashokkumar Narsibhai Solanki who is appearing party in person has no objection if the matter is taken up for ordering issuance of passport as per the adoption deed in respect of the petitioner-Amruta Vijay Vora, and therefore, the matter is taken up for final hearing today with the consent of all parties.

( 2 ) THE short facts of the case are that the petitioner is the daughter borne out of the marriage of Alkaben Chunilal Bhokiya with Ashokumar Narsibhai Solanki-the respondent No. 2 herein. The marriage of aforesaid Ashokkumar and Alkaben had taken place on 16. 5. 1989 and thereafter the petitioner was borne on 13. 5. 1991. It appears that because of differences between Alkaben and Ashokbhai Hindu Marriage Petition No. 51/94 was filed in the court of District Judge, Junagadh for consent divorce. On 10. 10. 1994 the divorce deed was also executed between aforesaid husband and wife, namely, Ashokbhai and Alkaben and as per the said deed the custody of the petitioner was to be retained by the mother, namely, Alkaben. The said deed was also plac












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top